Source File
sais.go
Belonging Package
index/suffixarray
// Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.// Suffix array construction by induced sorting (SAIS).// See Ge Nong, Sen Zhang, and Wai Hong Chen,// "Two Efficient Algorithms for Linear Time Suffix Array Construction",// especially section 3 (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5582081).// See also http://zork.net/~st/jottings/sais.html.//// With optimizations inspired by Yuta Mori's sais-lite// (https://sites.google.com/site/yuta256/sais).//// And with other new optimizations.// Many of these functions are parameterized by the sizes of// the types they operate on. The generator gen.go makes// copies of these functions for use with other sizes.// Specifically://// - A function with a name ending in _8_32 takes []byte and []int32 arguments// and is duplicated into _32_32, _8_64, and _64_64 forms.// The _32_32 and _64_64_ suffixes are shortened to plain _32 and _64.// Any lines in the function body that contain the text "byte-only" or "256"// are stripped when creating _32_32 and _64_64 forms.// (Those lines are typically 8-bit-specific optimizations.)//// - A function with a name ending only in _32 operates on []int32// and is duplicated into a _64 form. (Note that it may still take a []byte,// but there is no need for a version of the function in which the []byte// is widened to a full integer array.)// The overall runtime of this code is linear in the input size:// it runs a sequence of linear passes to reduce the problem to// a subproblem at most half as big, invokes itself recursively,// and then runs a sequence of linear passes to turn the answer// for the subproblem into the answer for the original problem.// This gives T(N) = O(N) + T(N/2) = O(N) + O(N/2) + O(N/4) + ... = O(N).//// The outline of the code, with the forward and backward scans// through O(N)-sized arrays called out, is://// sais_I_N// placeLMS_I_B// bucketMax_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text> (1)// <scan +freq> (2)// <scan -text, random bucket> (3)// induceSubL_I_B// bucketMin_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text, often optimized away> (4)// <scan +freq> (5)// <scan +sa, random text, random bucket> (6)// induceSubS_I_B// bucketMax_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text, often optimized away> (7)// <scan +freq> (8)// <scan -sa, random text, random bucket> (9)// assignID_I_B// <scan +sa, random text substrings> (10)// map_B// <scan -sa> (11)// recurse_B// (recursive call to sais_B_B for a subproblem of size at most 1/2 input, often much smaller)// unmap_I_B// <scan -text> (12)// <scan +sa> (13)// expand_I_B// bucketMax_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text, often optimized away> (14)// <scan +freq> (15)// <scan -sa, random text, random bucket> (16)// induceL_I_B// bucketMin_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text, often optimized away> (17)// <scan +freq> (18)// <scan +sa, random text, random bucket> (19)// induceS_I_B// bucketMax_I_B// freq_I_B// <scan +text, often optimized away> (20)// <scan +freq> (21)// <scan -sa, random text, random bucket> (22)//// Here, _B indicates the suffix array size (_32 or _64) and _I the input size (_8 or _B).//// The outline shows there are in general 22 scans through// O(N)-sized arrays for a given level of the recursion.// In the top level, operating on 8-bit input text,// the six freq scans are fixed size (256) instead of potentially// input-sized. Also, the frequency is counted once and cached// whenever there is room to do so (there is nearly always room in general,// and always room at the top level), which eliminates all but// the first freq_I_B text scans (that is, 5 of the 6).// So the top level of the recursion only does 22 - 6 - 5 = 11// input-sized scans and a typical level does 16 scans.//// The linear scans do not cost anywhere near as much as// the random accesses to the text made during a few of// the scans (specifically #6, #9, #16, #19, #22 marked above).// In real texts, there is not much but some locality to// the accesses, due to the repetitive structure of the text// (the same reason Burrows-Wheeler compression is so effective).// For random inputs, there is no locality, which makes those// accesses even more expensive, especially once the text// no longer fits in cache.// For example, running on 50 MB of Go source code, induceSubL_8_32// (which runs only once, at the top level of the recursion)// takes 0.44s, while on 50 MB of random input, it takes 2.55s.// Nearly all the relative slowdown is explained by the text access://// c0, c1 := text[k-1], text[k]//// That line runs for 0.23s on the Go text and 2.02s on random text.//go:generate go run gen.gopackage suffixarray// text_32 returns the suffix array for the input text.// It requires that len(text) fit in an int32// and that the caller zero sa.func text_32( []byte, []int32) {if int(int32(len())) != len() || len() != len() {panic("suffixarray: misuse of text_32")}sais_8_32(, 256, , make([]int32, 2*256))}// sais_8_32 computes the suffix array of text.// The text must contain only values in [0, textMax).// The suffix array is stored in sa, which the caller// must ensure is already zeroed.// The caller must also provide temporary space tmp// with len(tmp) ≥ textMax. If len(tmp) ≥ 2*textMax// then the algorithm runs a little faster.// If sais_8_32 modifies tmp, it sets tmp[0] = -1 on return.func sais_8_32( []byte, int, , []int32) {if len() != len() || len() < {panic("suffixarray: misuse of sais_8_32")}// Trivial base cases. Sorting 0 or 1 things is easy.if len() == 0 {return}if len() == 1 {[0] = 0return}// Establish slices indexed by text character// holding character frequency and bucket-sort offsets.// If there's only enough tmp for one slice,// we make it the bucket offsets and recompute// the character frequency each time we need it.var , []int32if len() >= 2* {, = [:], [:2*][0] = -1 // mark as uninitialized} else {, = nil, [:]}// The SAIS algorithm.// Each of these calls makes one scan through sa.// See the individual functions for documentation// about each's role in the algorithm.:= placeLMS_8_32(, , , )if <= 1 {// 0 or 1 items are already sorted. Do nothing.} else {induceSubL_8_32(, , , )induceSubS_8_32(, , , )length_8_32(, , ):= assignID_8_32(, , )if < {map_32(, )recurse_32(, , , )unmap_8_32(, , )} else {// If maxID == numLMS, then each LMS-substring// is unique, so the relative ordering of two LMS-suffixes// is determined by just the leading LMS-substring.// That is, the LMS-suffix sort order matches the// (simpler) LMS-substring sort order.// Copy the original LMS-substring order into the// suffix array destination.copy(, [len()-:])}expand_8_32(, , , , )}induceL_8_32(, , , )induceS_8_32(, , , )// Mark for caller that we overwrote tmp.[0] = -1}// freq_8_32 returns the character frequencies// for text, as a slice indexed by character value.// If freq is nil, freq_8_32 uses and returns bucket.// If freq is non-nil, freq_8_32 assumes that freq[0] >= 0// means the frequencies are already computed.// If the frequency data is overwritten or uninitialized,// the caller must set freq[0] = -1 to force recomputation// the next time it is needed.func freq_8_32( []byte, , []int32) []int32 {if != nil && [0] >= 0 {return // already computed}if == nil {=}= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for freq[c] belowclear()for , := range {[]++}return}// bucketMin_8_32 stores into bucket[c] the minimum index// in the bucket for character c in a bucket-sort of text.func bucketMin_8_32( []byte, , []int32) {= freq_8_32(, , )= [:256] // establish len(freq) = 256, so 0 ≤ i < 256 below= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[i] below:= int32(0)for , := range {[] =+=}}// bucketMax_8_32 stores into bucket[c] the maximum index// in the bucket for character c in a bucket-sort of text.// The bucket indexes for c are [min, max).// That is, max is one past the final index in that bucket.func bucketMax_8_32( []byte, , []int32) {= freq_8_32(, , )= [:256] // establish len(freq) = 256, so 0 ≤ i < 256 below= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[i] below:= int32(0)for , := range {+=[] =}}// The SAIS algorithm proceeds in a sequence of scans through sa.// Each of the following functions implements one scan,// and the functions appear here in the order they execute in the algorithm.// placeLMS_8_32 places into sa the indexes of the// final characters of the LMS substrings of text,// sorted into the rightmost ends of their correct buckets// in the suffix array.//// The imaginary sentinel character at the end of the text// is the final character of the final LMS substring, but there// is no bucket for the imaginary sentinel character,// which has a smaller value than any real character.// The caller must therefore pretend that sa[-1] == len(text).//// The text indexes of LMS-substring characters are always ≥ 1// (the first LMS-substring must be preceded by one or more L-type// characters that are not part of any LMS-substring),// so using 0 as a “not present” suffix array entry is safe,// both in this function and in most later functions// (until induceL_8_32 below).func placeLMS_8_32( []byte, , , []int32) int {bucketMax_8_32(, , ):= 0:= int32(-1)= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[c1] below// The next stanza of code (until the blank line) loop backward// over text, stopping to execute a code body at each position i// such that text[i] is an L-character and text[i+1] is an S-character.// That is, i+1 is the position of the start of an LMS-substring.// These could be hoisted out into a function with a callback,// but at a significant speed cost. Instead, we just write these// seven lines a few times in this source file. The copies below// refer back to the pattern established by this original as the// "LMS-substring iterator".//// In every scan through the text, c0, c1 are successive characters of text.// In this backward scan, c0 == text[i] and c1 == text[i+1].// By scanning backward, we can keep track of whether the current// position is type-S or type-L according to the usual definition://// - position len(text) is type S with text[len(text)] == -1 (the sentinel)// - position i is type S if text[i] < text[i+1], or if text[i] == text[i+1] && i+1 is type S.// - position i is type L if text[i] > text[i+1], or if text[i] == text[i+1] && i+1 is type L.//// The backward scan lets us maintain the current type,// update it when we see c0 != c1, and otherwise leave it alone.// We want to identify all S positions with a preceding L.// Position len(text) is one such position by definition, but we have// nowhere to write it down, so we eliminate it by untruthfully// setting isTypeS = false at the start of the loop., , := byte(0), byte(0), falsefor := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {, = [],if < {= true} else if > && {= false// Bucket the index i+1 for the start of an LMS-substring.:= [] - 1[] =[] = int32( + 1)=++}}// We recorded the LMS-substring starts but really want the ends.// Luckily, with two differences, the start indexes and the end indexes are the same.// The first difference is that the rightmost LMS-substring's end index is len(text),// so the caller must pretend that sa[-1] == len(text), as noted above.// The second difference is that the first leftmost LMS-substring start index// does not end an earlier LMS-substring, so as an optimization we can omit// that leftmost LMS-substring start index (the last one we wrote).//// Exception: if numLMS <= 1, the caller is not going to bother with// the recursion at all and will treat the result as containing LMS-substring starts.// In that case, we don't remove the final entry.if > 1 {[] = 0}return}// induceSubL_8_32 inserts the L-type text indexes of LMS-substrings// into sa, assuming that the final characters of the LMS-substrings// are already inserted into sa, sorted by final character, and at the// right (not left) end of the corresponding character bucket.// Each LMS-substring has the form (as a regexp) /S+L+S/:// one or more S-type, one or more L-type, final S-type.// induceSubL_8_32 leaves behind only the leftmost L-type text// index for each LMS-substring. That is, it removes the final S-type// indexes that are present on entry, and it inserts but then removes// the interior L-type indexes too.// (Only the leftmost L-type index is needed by induceSubS_8_32.)func induceSubL_8_32( []byte, , , []int32) {// Initialize positions for left side of character buckets.bucketMin_8_32(, , )= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[cB] below// As we scan the array left-to-right, each sa[i] = j > 0 is a correctly// sorted suffix array entry (for text[j:]) for which we know that j-1 is type L.// Because j-1 is type L, inserting it into sa now will sort it correctly.// But we want to distinguish a j-1 with j-2 of type L from type S.// We can process the former but want to leave the latter for the caller.// We record the difference by negating j-1 if it is preceded by type S.// Either way, the insertion (into the text[j-1] bucket) is guaranteed to// happen at sa[i´] for some i´ > i, that is, in the portion of sa we have// yet to scan. A single pass therefore sees indexes j, j-1, j-2, j-3,// and so on, in sorted but not necessarily adjacent order, until it finds// one preceded by an index of type S, at which point it must stop.//// As we scan through the array, we clear the worked entries (sa[i] > 0) to zero,// and we flip sa[i] < 0 to -sa[i], so that the loop finishes with sa containing// only the indexes of the leftmost L-type indexes for each LMS-substring.//// The suffix array sa therefore serves simultaneously as input, output,// and a miraculously well-tailored work queue.// placeLMS_8_32 left out the implicit entry sa[-1] == len(text),// corresponding to the identified type-L index len(text)-1.// Process it before the left-to-right scan of sa proper.// See body in loop for commentary.:= len() - 1, := [-1], []if < {= -}// Cache recently used bucket index:// we're processing suffixes in sorted order// and accessing buckets indexed by the// byte before the sorted order, which still// has very good locality.// Invariant: b is cached, possibly dirty copy of bucket[cB].:=:= [][] = int32()++for := 0; < len(); ++ {:= int([])if == 0 {// Skip empty entry.continue}if < 0 {// Leave discovered type-S index for caller.[] = int32(-)continue}[] = 0// Index j was on work queue, meaning k := j-1 is L-type,// so we can now place k correctly into sa.// If k-1 is L-type, queue k for processing later in this loop.// If k-1 is S-type (text[k-1] < text[k]), queue -k to save for the caller.:= - 1, := [-1], []if < {= -}if != {[] === []}[] = int32()++}}// induceSubS_8_32 inserts the S-type text indexes of LMS-substrings// into sa, assuming that the leftmost L-type text indexes are already// inserted into sa, sorted by LMS-substring suffix, and at the// left end of the corresponding character bucket.// Each LMS-substring has the form (as a regexp) /S+L+S/:// one or more S-type, one or more L-type, final S-type.// induceSubS_8_32 leaves behind only the leftmost S-type text// index for each LMS-substring, in sorted order, at the right end of sa.// That is, it removes the L-type indexes that are present on entry,// and it inserts but then removes the interior S-type indexes too,// leaving the LMS-substring start indexes packed into sa[len(sa)-numLMS:].// (Only the LMS-substring start indexes are processed by the recursion.)func induceSubS_8_32( []byte, , , []int32) {// Initialize positions for right side of character buckets.bucketMax_8_32(, , )= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[cB] below// Analogous to induceSubL_8_32 above,// as we scan the array right-to-left, each sa[i] = j > 0 is a correctly// sorted suffix array entry (for text[j:]) for which we know that j-1 is type S.// Because j-1 is type S, inserting it into sa now will sort it correctly.// But we want to distinguish a j-1 with j-2 of type S from type L.// We can process the former but want to leave the latter for the caller.// We record the difference by negating j-1 if it is preceded by type L.// Either way, the insertion (into the text[j-1] bucket) is guaranteed to// happen at sa[i´] for some i´ < i, that is, in the portion of sa we have// yet to scan. A single pass therefore sees indexes j, j-1, j-2, j-3,// and so on, in sorted but not necessarily adjacent order, until it finds// one preceded by an index of type L, at which point it must stop.// That index (preceded by one of type L) is an LMS-substring start.//// As we scan through the array, we clear the worked entries (sa[i] > 0) to zero,// and we flip sa[i] < 0 to -sa[i] and compact into the top of sa,// so that the loop finishes with the top of sa containing exactly// the LMS-substring start indexes, sorted by LMS-substring.// Cache recently used bucket index::= byte(0):= []:= len()for := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {:= int([])if == 0 {// Skip empty entry.continue}[] = 0if < 0 {// Leave discovered LMS-substring start index for caller.--[] = int32(-)continue}// Index j was on work queue, meaning k := j-1 is S-type,// so we can now place k correctly into sa.// If k-1 is S-type, queue k for processing later in this loop.// If k-1 is L-type (text[k-1] > text[k]), queue -k to save for the caller.:= - 1:= []:= [-1]if > {= -}if != {[] === []}--[] = int32()}}// length_8_32 computes and records the length of each LMS-substring in text.// The length of the LMS-substring at index j is stored at sa[j/2],// avoiding the LMS-substring indexes already stored in the top half of sa.// (If index j is an LMS-substring start, then index j-1 is type L and cannot be.)// There are two exceptions, made for optimizations in name_8_32 below.//// First, the final LMS-substring is recorded as having length 0, which is otherwise// impossible, instead of giving it a length that includes the implicit sentinel.// This ensures the final LMS-substring has length unequal to all others// and therefore can be detected as different without text comparison// (it is unequal because it is the only one that ends in the implicit sentinel,// and the text comparison would be problematic since the implicit sentinel// is not actually present at text[len(text)]).//// Second, to avoid text comparison entirely, if an LMS-substring is very short,// sa[j/2] records its actual text instead of its length, so that if two such// substrings have matching “length,” the text need not be read at all.// The definition of “very short” is that the text bytes must pack into a uint32,// and the unsigned encoding e must be ≥ len(text), so that it can be// distinguished from a valid length.func length_8_32( []byte, []int32, int) {:= 0 // index of current LMS-substring end (0 indicates final LMS-substring)// The encoding of N text bytes into a “length” word// adds 1 to each byte, packs them into the bottom// N*8 bits of a word, and then bitwise inverts the result.// That is, the text sequence A B C (hex 41 42 43)// encodes as ^uint32(0x42_43_44).// LMS-substrings can never start or end with 0xFF.// Adding 1 ensures the encoded byte sequence never// starts or ends with 0x00, so that present bytes can be// distinguished from zero-padding in the top bits,// so the length need not be separately encoded.// Inverting the bytes increases the chance that a// 4-byte encoding will still be ≥ len(text).// In particular, if the first byte is ASCII (<= 0x7E, so +1 <= 0x7F)// then the high bit of the inversion will be set,// making it clearly not a valid length (it would be a negative one).//// cx holds the pre-inverted encoding (the packed incremented bytes).:= uint32(0) // byte-only// This stanza (until the blank line) is the "LMS-substring iterator",// described in placeLMS_8_32 above, with one line added to maintain cx., , := byte(0), byte(0), falsefor := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {, = [],= <<8 | uint32(+1) // byte-onlyif < {= true} else if > && {= false// Index j = i+1 is the start of an LMS-substring.// Compute length or encoded text to store in sa[j/2].:= + 1var int32if == 0 {= 0} else {= int32( - )if <= 32/8 && ^ >= uint32(len()) { // byte-only= int32(^) // byte-only} // byte-only}[>>1] == + 1= uint32( + 1) // byte-only}}}// assignID_8_32 assigns a dense ID numbering to the// set of LMS-substrings respecting string ordering and equality,// returning the maximum assigned ID.// For example given the input "ababab", the LMS-substrings// are "aba", "aba", and "ab", renumbered as 2 2 1.// sa[len(sa)-numLMS:] holds the LMS-substring indexes// sorted in string order, so to assign numbers we can// consider each in turn, removing adjacent duplicates.// The new ID for the LMS-substring at index j is written to sa[j/2],// overwriting the length previously stored there (by length_8_32 above).func assignID_8_32( []byte, []int32, int) int {:= 0:= int32(-1) // impossible:= int32(0)for , := range [len()-:] {// Is the LMS-substring at index j new, or is it the same as the last one we saw?:= [/2]if != {goto}if uint32() >= uint32(len()) {// “Length” is really encoded full text, and they match.goto}{// Compare actual texts.:= int():= [:][:]:= [:][:]for := 0; < ; ++ {if [] != [] {goto}}goto}:++==:[/2] = int32()}return}// map_32 maps the LMS-substrings in text to their new IDs,// producing the subproblem for the recursion.// The mapping itself was mostly applied by assignID_8_32:// sa[i] is either 0, the ID for the LMS-substring at index 2*i,// or the ID for the LMS-substring at index 2*i+1.// To produce the subproblem we need only remove the zeros// and change ID into ID-1 (our IDs start at 1, but text chars start at 0).//// map_32 packs the result, which is the input to the recursion,// into the top of sa, so that the recursion result can be stored// in the bottom of sa, which sets up for expand_8_32 well.func map_32( []int32, int) {:= len()for := len() / 2; >= 0; -- {:= []if > 0 {--[] = - 1}}}// recurse_32 calls sais_32 recursively to solve the subproblem we've built.// The subproblem is at the right end of sa, the suffix array result will be// written at the left end of sa, and the middle of sa is available for use as// temporary frequency and bucket storage.func recurse_32(, []int32, , int) {, , := [:], [:len()-], [len()-:]// Set up temporary space for recursive call.// We must pass sais_32 a tmp buffer with at least maxID entries.//// The subproblem is guaranteed to have length at most len(sa)/2,// so that sa can hold both the subproblem and its suffix array.// Nearly all the time, however, the subproblem has length < len(sa)/3,// in which case there is a subproblem-sized middle of sa that// we can reuse for temporary space (saTmp).// When recurse_32 is called from sais_8_32, oldTmp is length 512// (from text_32), and saTmp will typically be much larger, so we'll use saTmp.// When deeper recursions come back to recurse_32, now oldTmp is// the saTmp from the top-most recursion, it is typically larger than// the current saTmp (because the current sa gets smaller and smaller// as the recursion gets deeper), and we keep reusing that top-most// large saTmp instead of the offered smaller ones.//// Why is the subproblem length so often just under len(sa)/3?// See Nong, Zhang, and Chen, section 3.6 for a plausible explanation.// In brief, the len(sa)/2 case would correspond to an SLSLSLSLSLSL pattern// in the input, perfect alternation of larger and smaller input bytes.// Real text doesn't do that. If each L-type index is randomly followed// by either an L-type or S-type index, then half the substrings will// be of the form SLS, but the other half will be longer. Of that half,// half (a quarter overall) will be SLLS; an eighth will be SLLLS, and so on.// Not counting the final S in each (which overlaps the first S in the next),// This works out to an average length 2×½ + 3×¼ + 4×⅛ + ... = 3.// The space we need is further reduced by the fact that many of the// short patterns like SLS will often be the same character sequences// repeated throughout the text, reducing maxID relative to numLMS.//// For short inputs, the averages may not run in our favor, but then we// can often fall back to using the length-512 tmp available in the// top-most call. (Also a short allocation would not be a big deal.)//// For pathological inputs, we fall back to allocating a new tmp of length// max(maxID, numLMS/2). This level of the recursion needs maxID,// and all deeper levels of the recursion will need no more than numLMS/2,// so this one allocation is guaranteed to suffice for the entire stack// of recursive calls.:=if len() < len() {=}if len() < {// TestSAIS/forcealloc reaches this code.:=if < /2 {= / 2}= make([]int32, )}// sais_32 requires that the caller arrange to clear dst,// because in general the caller may know dst is// freshly-allocated and already cleared. But this one is not.clear()sais_32(, , , )}// unmap_8_32 unmaps the subproblem back to the original.// sa[:numLMS] is the LMS-substring numbers, which don't matter much anymore.// sa[len(sa)-numLMS:] is the sorted list of those LMS-substring numbers.// The key part is that if the list says K that means the K'th substring.// We can replace sa[:numLMS] with the indexes of the LMS-substrings.// Then if the list says K it really means sa[K].// Having mapped the list back to LMS-substring indexes,// we can place those into the right buckets.func unmap_8_32( []byte, []int32, int) {:= [len()-:]:= len()// "LMS-substring iterator" (see placeLMS_8_32 above)., , := byte(0), byte(0), falsefor := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {, = [],if < {= true} else if > && {= false// Populate inverse map.--[] = int32( + 1)}}// Apply inverse map to subproblem suffix array.= [:]for := 0; < len(); ++ {[] = [[]]}}// expand_8_32 distributes the compacted, sorted LMS-suffix indexes// from sa[:numLMS] into the tops of the appropriate buckets in sa,// preserving the sorted order and making room for the L-type indexes// to be slotted into the sorted sequence by induceL_8_32.func expand_8_32( []byte, , , []int32, int) {bucketMax_8_32(, , )= [:256] // eliminate bound check for bucket[c] below// Loop backward through sa, always tracking// the next index to populate from sa[:numLMS].// When we get to one, populate it.// Zero the rest of the slots; they have dead values in them.:= - 1:= []:= []:= [] - 1[] =for := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {if != int() {[] = 0continue}[] =// Load next entry to put down (if any).if > 0 {--= [] // TODO bounds check= []= [] - 1[] =}}}// induceL_8_32 inserts L-type text indexes into sa,// assuming that the leftmost S-type indexes are inserted// into sa, in sorted order, in the right bucket halves.// It leaves all the L-type indexes in sa, but the// leftmost L-type indexes are negated, to mark them// for processing by induceS_8_32.func induceL_8_32( []byte, , , []int32) {// Initialize positions for left side of character buckets.bucketMin_8_32(, , )= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[cB] below// This scan is similar to the one in induceSubL_8_32 above.// That one arranges to clear all but the leftmost L-type indexes.// This scan leaves all the L-type indexes and the original S-type// indexes, but it negates the positive leftmost L-type indexes// (the ones that induceS_8_32 needs to process).// expand_8_32 left out the implicit entry sa[-1] == len(text),// corresponding to the identified type-L index len(text)-1.// Process it before the left-to-right scan of sa proper.// See body in loop for commentary.:= len() - 1, := [-1], []if < {= -}// Cache recently used bucket index.:=:= [][] = int32()++for := 0; < len(); ++ {:= int([])if <= 0 {// Skip empty or negated entry (including negated zero).continue}// Index j was on work queue, meaning k := j-1 is L-type,// so we can now place k correctly into sa.// If k-1 is L-type, queue k for processing later in this loop.// If k-1 is S-type (text[k-1] < text[k]), queue -k to save for the caller.// If k is zero, k-1 doesn't exist, so we only need to leave it// for the caller. The caller can't tell the difference between// an empty slot and a non-empty zero, but there's no need// to distinguish them anyway: the final suffix array will end up// with one zero somewhere, and that will be a real zero.:= - 1:= []if > 0 {if := [-1]; < {= -}}if != {[] === []}[] = int32()++}}func induceS_8_32( []byte, , , []int32) {// Initialize positions for right side of character buckets.bucketMax_8_32(, , )= [:256] // eliminate bounds check for bucket[cB] below:= byte(0):= []for := len() - 1; >= 0; -- {:= int([])if >= 0 {// Skip non-flagged entry.// (This loop can't see an empty entry; 0 means the real zero index.)continue}// Negative j is a work queue entry; rewrite to positive j for final suffix array.= -[] = int32()// Index j was on work queue (encoded as -j but now decoded),// meaning k := j-1 is L-type,// so we can now place k correctly into sa.// If k-1 is S-type, queue -k for processing later in this loop.// If k-1 is L-type (text[k-1] > text[k]), queue k to save for the caller.// If k is zero, k-1 doesn't exist, so we only need to leave it// for the caller.:= - 1:= []if > 0 {if := [-1]; <= {= -}}if != {[] === []}--[] = int32()}}
![]() |
The pages are generated with Golds v0.7.9-preview. (GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64) Golds is a Go 101 project developed by Tapir Liu. PR and bug reports are welcome and can be submitted to the issue list. Please follow @zigo_101 (reachable from the left QR code) to get the latest news of Golds. |